WoW BlueTracker Home | RSS | News | Contact
Recent | Search | Archive | CS Posts
Poster: Crazyb at 9/21/2005 11:52:25 AM PDT
Subject: Sweeping strieks + WW: intended or Abusive
   As of the new patch, the warriors 3 main abilities (shield wall, rekclessness and retaliation) were designed to stay with you even if you switch stances.

I dont know if it was intended but it applies to all warrior abilities now, thus a MS warrior could hit sweepign strikes in Battle Stance, then switch to berzerker stance and hit whirlwind gettign 8 attacks instantly. The dmg potential for this is unreal, un instant 5-10k (or more) dmg depending on crits is pretty sick.

This seems as not what was intended by the ability as in AB warrior heavy groups are tearing it up (to the slow unsuspecting groups).

Just wanted to get your thoughts on it and wondered if this was the intended design of the ability
http://whatisrlrlrlgh.ytmnd.com/ UV JUST BEEN MURLOCD
  http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-warrior&t=486674&p=#post486674
 
Poster: Fangtooth at 9/22/2005 5:52:21 PM PDT
Subject: Re: Sweeping strieks + WW: intended or Abusiv
   This is something we are aware of, and we are currently working on a solution. As soon as we have more information for you, we will let you know.
Fact: Fangtooth drives a monster truck.

-Nigma
  http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-warrior&t=486674&p=#post490591
Poster: Fangtooth at 9/22/2005 5:52:21 PM PDT
Subject: Re: Sweeping strieks + WW: intended or Abusiv *edited post*
   This is something we are aware of, and we are currently working on a solution. As soon as we have more information for you, we will let you know.
Fact: Fangtooth drives a monster truck.

-Nigma
  http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-warrior&t=486674&p=#post490591

View all recent official Blue Posts

WoW Blue Tracker: Archiving World of Warcraft Blue Posts
since March 2005
Home | RSS | News | Contact
Recent | Search | Archive | CS Posts
 

Why Ads?