Poster: Vyna at 7/7/2006 12:01:35 PM PDT
Subject: One more set of Pluralization Questions. |
| |
Thanks for your help on the Furbolg question. I have a few others that I am iffy on whether or not to add an 's' to the end of these. Can you guys give me some feedback on the plural form of these names? The following are the singular tense (I think, correct me if I'm wrong), can you let me know if the plural tense requires an 's'?
Thanks!
1) Kodo
2) Eredar
3) Nathrezim
4) Succubi
5) Draenei
6) Gronn
7) Makrura
8) Naga
9) Pandaren
10) Tauren
11) Tuskarr
12) Wildkin
13) Worgen
I know it's a long list but your contributions will help ensure we have accurate wikipedia pages. Thanks again!
Vyna
|
| | http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general&t=8978415&p=#post8978415 |
| |
Poster: Tseric at 7/7/2006 3:17:19 PM PDT
Subject: Re: One more set of Pluralization Questions. |
| |
Interesting. All of your examples seem to share singular/plural forms. From looking at it, all of the names you listed apply equally, much like shaman and shaman.
If we don't expect, we have all things
|
| | http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general&t=8978415&p=#post8981284 |
Poster: Tseric at 7/7/2006 3:20:03 PM PDT
Subject: Re: One more set of Pluralization Questions. |
| |
Q u o t e:
4) Succubi
is already plural. The singular is Succubus.
Right. Missed that.
If we don't expect, we have all things
|
| | http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general&t=8978415&p=#post8981306 |
Poster: Tseric at 7/7/2006 3:20:37 PM PDT
Subject: Re: One more set of Pluralization Questions. |
| |
Q u o t e:
I feel the need to point out the plurality of Succubi and the singularity of Succubus a third time.
Duly noted. Heh.
If we don't expect, we have all things
|
| | http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general&t=8978415&p=#post8981310 |
