WoW BlueTracker: Binary Spells made up yesterday!

WoW Blue Tracker	Home \| RSS \| News \| Contact Recent \| Search \| Archive \| CS Posts

Poster: Coldstone at 9/22/2005 1:52:41 PM PDT Subject: Binary Spells made up yesterday!
	In an attempt to describe the effect of +hit to spell bonuses on items, Eyonix described frost spells as "binary." Where did this term come from? Googling World of Warcraft with "binary spell" didn't come up with much. Nor is it described on any of Blizzard's game mechanics pages: http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/basics/spells.html http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/basics/resistances.html Was this term simply fabricated to cover for the fact that frost spells remain irrevocably broken? Is it to cover for the fact they're too lazy to program partial resists?
	http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general&t=4995978&p=#post4995978

Poster: Tseric at 9/22/2005 2:32:54 PM PDT Subject: Re: Binary Spells made up yesterday!
	Just for clarification...scroll down for Eyonix's post. http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?FN=wow-general&T=4978724&P=2 All things are subject to change
	http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general&t=4995978&p=#post4996878
Poster: Tseric at 9/22/2005 2:32:54 PM PDT Subject: Re: Binary Spells made up yesterday! edited post
	Just for clarification...scroll down for Eyonix's post. http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?FN=wow-general&T=4978724&P=2 All things are subject to change
	http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general&t=4995978&p=#post4996878

WoW Blue Tracker: Archiving World of Warcraft Blue Posts since March 2005	Home \| RSS \| News \| Contact Recent \| Search \| Archive \| CS Posts

Why Ads?