WoW BlueTracker Home | RSS | News | Contact
Recent | Search | Archive | CS Posts
Poster: Unferno at 1/6/2006 1:25:41 AM PST
Subject: It's not 1.10 - It's 2.0
   Ok, I've been seeing some posts here, about future changes to some classes in next patch, and people are refering to it as patch version 1.10, which is obviously wrong, cause 1.10 is before 1.9(0).

The next major patch will be numbered 2.0, between there will be minor versions like 1.91, 1.92, etc, etc.. till 2.0.

Saying that "upcoming changes to priest in 1.10..." is like saying "I really will liked that pie yesterday".
Go not to the elves for counsel, for they will say bo
  http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general-en&t=757327&p=#post757327
 
Poster: Aeus at 1/6/2006 2:21:12 AM PST
Subject: Re: It's not 1.10 - It's 2.0
  

Q u o t e:
it would be SOOOOOO funny if Aeus or Thundgot came in here and said...

" it's 1.10 , now shut up. "

>P


It's 1.10 , now shut up.

(Well, I couldn't not, right :))
It's fine, Learn 2 Post.
  http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general-en&t=757327&p=#post757520
Poster: Aeus at 1/6/2006 4:54:54 AM PST
Subject: Re: It's not 1.10 - It's 2.0
   Basically it might help to think of Patch 1.1 as 1.01, then 1.2 as 1.02, etc :) After 1.9 (= 1.09) it would make sense to have 1.10
It's fine, Learn 2 Post.
  http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general-en&t=757327&p=#post758196

View all recent official Blue Posts

WoW Blue Tracker: Archiving World of Warcraft Blue Posts
since March 2005
Home | RSS | News | Contact
Recent | Search | Archive | CS Posts
 

Why Ads?