Poster: Healya at 5/22/2006 7:38:17 AM PDT
Subject: Migration plans Windhammer, Concern: Ratios.. |
| |
Q u o t e:
May 29th - June 2nd
Stormrage --> Wildhammer (new realm)
Turalyon --> Wildhammer (new realm)
June 5th-9th
Bloodhoof --> Wildhammer
Thunderhorn --> Wildhammer
Alliance:Horde ratios on the servers in question(based on stats from warcraftrealms.com)
Turalyon: 12.6k to 6.5k
Stormrage: 11.5k to 3.3k
Bloodhoof: 11.6k to 3.9k
Thunderhorn: 6.8k to 4.3k
Sooo... thats going to give a nice Alliance:Horde ratio...
The way I see it... when the 4 realms see these numbers they wont leave. Horde wont leave because they'll get outnumbered even more... Alliance wont leave because they wont get any horde... meaning same kind of queues for Battlegrounds...
Horde will have next to no queue, but will have next to no chance to killing World bosses...
Can someone explain this to me please why 4 servers with bigger alliance ratios get to move to 1 new server...
thanks[ post edited by Healya ]
-= Hator lvl 60 warrior / Healya lvl 60 priest =-
|
| | http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general-en&t=1022428&p=#post1022428 |
| |
Poster: Thundgot at 5/22/2006 3:22:37 PM PDT
Subject: Re: Migration plans Windhammer, Concern: Rati |
| |
First of all, don't base too much on numbers from 3rd party sites. I don't have access to the correct numbers from home, but the ones in the first post seem to give a very much exaggerated impression of the situation. Stormrage (or any realm) worse than 3:1? I very much doubt that. :)
I think most PvE realms share roughly the same ratio, with the possible exception of some newer realms. Finding realms that can balance each other out in a migration is (without checking the exact numbers now) probably not very doable.
I'll make sure to double-check the ratios on the most eligible source realms though and see whether we can do a little balancing, but as said I think that's tricky.
That there is one damn fine epic you're wearin'.
|
| | http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-general-en&t=1022428&p=#post1023228 |
